STILLS:

    -     Home     -     Stills     -     Animations     -     Register     -     FAQ     -     TC-RTC Rules     -     Contact Us     -     Forum     -     Member Area     -    

Revolution

Member : DrNo
Revolution
Title : Revolution
Name : Normand Brière
Country : Canada
Email : #############
Webpage : www.noware.ca
Topic : Clocks (January)
Copyright : Agreed - 2009-02-14 10:07:20
JPG file : pw-1234606040-revolution.jpg
Renderer Used : OpenGL (ARB program)
Tools used : Homemade Java software + Seashore
Render Time : 2 minutes
Hardware Used : Macintosh Core 2 Duo, RadeonX1600
Image description

Using the moon solely, one can get a good accuracy of time evolution. Hours can be measured using a "moonlight dial", days can be estimated through moon phases, as well as months thanks to the inclination of the lunar orbit relative to Earth's equatorial plane.

Of course the observation of celestial bodies is still very useful, but considering a solar system as a clock dial would be more complicated than accurate. From one extreme to another, the physical properties of nature also allow for incredibly precise time measurement.

Going from the moon clock to the atomic clock was truly a revolution.

Description of how this image was created

This shot has been ready for a few weeks, but I decided to wait until the very end not to spoil the concept of someone else. This 3rd shot was not really important, but it is kinda cool I think, so there it is. It looks like a hybrid between the first two. We have the timekeeping aspect together with infinitely many clocks that should or not cover the entire background when we take the speed of light and the origin of the universe into account.

Technically, there is nothing really special about it. The moon phases are made of 8 independent renderings gathered into a texture. Obviously, the light used for a moon must not illuminate the other moons. The "atomic" look of the moon clock comes from an anisotropic specular reflection.

General statistics
No of ratings : 15
Min. overall rating : 23 (8 / 8 / 7)
Max. overall rating : 48 (15 / 16 / 17)
Sum of rating : 566 / 900
Date uploaded : 2009-02-14 07:56:11
Specific details

Note: The maximum value below is misleading as the voting system has changed.
If the member votes for all the entries and has created one him/herself, there is an
automatic 20/20/20 score added to the value (This encourages all members who enter to vote).

Rating type :
Min : Max : Sum : Out of
Artistic :
8 : 20 : 192 : 300
Concept :
8 : 20 : 188 : 300
Technical :
5 : 20 : 186 : 300
Overall :
23 : 60 : 566 : 900
Comments by members when rating this image
1.   24-02-2009 How wide is your monitor ? :-P This is my favourite of your three (all good) images. I like the concept and the image would make a good poster. Very hard to find *anything* to criticise: 1)The background stars seem a little pixelated. 2)There's *slight* aliasing in the rings around some of the minor bodies. 3)The planets paths seem to be made of connected cylinders with visible joins which soehow is a nice effect except in the closest ring which looks a little odd. Could you have used tori for the rings and then added translucent spheres to them? No 1&2 are me being unreasonable and 3 is odd not wrong.
2.   24-02-2009 Very nicely artistic, but looks too '2D' for a 3D image. Nice shadows on the moon though, that works well.
3.   23-02-2009 This has a strong sense of a medieval cosmographic engraving.
4.   23-02-2009 I quite like this picture. Nicely done.
5.   18-02-2009 No, I think, you're going overboard here :). The moons really look great, and the planets are fine, too; earth looks a bit flat, and so does the sun (though I guess it can't be avoided; good idea to exaggerate the corona); bad idea to emphasize Jupiter's rings, I thought you had Saturn in there twice; very well distributed starfield, looks really good. Your planet "orbits" have artifacts. Nice idea to see the solar system as a clockwork, but not really striking overall. The picture lacks some depth.

- Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - FAQ - Contact Us -

Copyright © Steve Paget & Colin Price with Stephen McAvoy & Thomas de Groot : 2007-2011 - All rights reserved